weebls-stuff forums  

Go Back   weebls-stuff forums > Speshul interests > Debates and Serious Business

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2009, 02:21 AM   #46
ikat381
Empty pie dish
 
ikat381's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
ikat381 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokey View Post
Point 1. Just because an artist can earn money through touring doesn't mean you can steal their music...Point 3. In even more cases it has decreased sales. There's not even the lure of getting the real thing for increased quality so the "free trial argument" falls down a bit there.
The heaviest downloaders are also the biggest music customers:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...l-1812776.html
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2347/125/

Also, copyright violation is not the same as stealing. You might argue that it's just as bad as stealing (and I would disagree), but I don't think it's accurate to say that someone "steals" music when they download a song.

Last edited by ikat381; 12-11-2009 at 02:26 AM..
ikat381 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 05:49 PM   #47
Smokey
pissy pants
 
Smokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 1,573
Smokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Smokey
You take the goods of another without permission. That's stealing. Especially considering you can buy legal downloads which takes convenience out of the equation. On Amazon you can download a song with a single click.

And if the heaviest illegal downloaders spend more on music then just think how much more they should be spending. It just means they are stealing more. Plus in my experience the illegal downloaders I've known have downloaded around 10 times what they purchased at least.
__________________
Smokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 09:08 PM   #48
maxxy_p
I have tasted pmMike's urine. It was warm.
 
maxxy_p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Essex.
Posts: 861
maxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dogmaxxy_p has killed your dog
Send a message via MSN to maxxy_p
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokey View Post
You take the goods of another without permission. That's stealing. Especially considering you can buy legal downloads which takes convenience out of the equation. On Amazon you can download a song with a single click.
I don't think this argument helps the anti-downloading cause. It's not the same. By stealing someone's wallet or passport I am directly and deliberately depriving them of what is theirs and lowering their quality of life. No matter how you spin it, that's not what happens when you download. Maybe you shouldn't do it, maybe morally you owe them something, but you are not stealing from them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikat381 View Post
There’s a few reasons why I don’t think it’s completely contradictory to let people download things freely:

1) There’s other ways to make money with your art besides selling copies of it.
2) We know that free downloading has not stopped people from successfully selling copies.
3) We know that in many cases, free downloading has actually increased the sale of copies.
I think these are pretty poor arguments as well, from the other side. They are enabling arguments, excuses for "oh I can do this because maybe they'll still make money", rather than legitimate reasons why you have the right to download their stuff.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaquille O’Neal, rapping
I'm a horse.
maxxy_p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 10:40 PM   #49
ikat381
Empty pie dish
 
ikat381's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
ikat381 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxxy_p View Post
I think these are pretty poor arguments as well, from the other side. They are enabling arguments, excuses for "oh I can do this because maybe they'll still make money", rather than legitimate reasons why you have the right to download their stuff.
When a law is restricting your activities in a democratic country, it's up to the ones in power to prove that the law is justified, otherwise it should be scrapped.

We shouldn't have to ask ourselves "What is our legitimate reason for being able to download freely?" We should be asking lawmakers "What is the artists' legitimate reason for prohibiting people from downloading freely?"
ikat381 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2009, 10:38 AM   #50
Smokey
pissy pants
 
Smokey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 1,573
Smokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond reputeSmokey has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Smokey
Without trying to start a debate on the definition of stealing, lets say you are a photographer. If I bought a picture, copied it and gave it to a hundred other people then they wouldn't buy the original from you. This doesn't directly affect you but in real terms you have lost a hundred potential customers. You may not like defining it as stealing but the effects are similar and it is in no way morally justifiable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikat381 View Post
We shouldn't have to ask ourselves "What is our legitimate reason for being able to download freely?" We should be asking lawmakers "What is the artists' legitimate reason for prohibiting people from downloading freely?"
Because they work hard to make a product which they don't get their due proceeds from. This discourages them to make said product. That is why it is illegal and immoral.
__________________
Smokey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Weebl's Stuff